Who will be president come 2008?

Between all the choices, I'll tell you who I don't think should be president: Ms. Hilary Clinton. Someone who's agenda involves legislation against video games is not one I would recommend for the White House.

So any bets? Clinton (ugh), Obama, Giuliani, Kerry, Paul?

I'd put a £5 on Osama, just for the lulz. I hope hope hope it isn't that cockpiece Guliani though

Then again, Kerry isn't too high on my popularity list either...

Im still undecided but I certainly dont want Hillary or Guliani.

Ron Paul seems like the best option for me.

Are any of them Libertarian?

Unfortunately.....no

Any day now, this thread will follow countless others like the ones in P&G.

Ereshkigal wrote:

Are any of them Libertarian?

RP is proper libertarian, have a look at his house of representatives page

Chymikal wrote:

Ereshkigal wrote:

Are any of them Libertarian?

RP is proper libertarian, have a look at his house of representatives page

Voted NO on allowing human embryonic stem cell research. (May 2005)
Voted YES on banning partial-birth abortion except to save mother’s life. (Oct 2003)
Voted YES on banning partial-birth abortions. (Apr 2000)
Voted YES on protecting the Pledge of Allegiance. (Sep 2004)
Voted YES on banning gay adoptions in DC. (Jul 1999)

Chymikal wrote:

Ereshkigal wrote:

Are any of them Libertarian?

RP is proper libertarian, have a look at his house of representatives page

Voted NO on allowing human embryonic stem cell research. (May 2005)
Voted YES on banning partial-birth abortion except to save mother’s life. (Oct 2003)
Voted YES on banning partial-birth abortions. (Apr 2000)
Voted YES on protecting the Pledge of Allegiance. (Sep 2004)
Voted YES on banning gay adoptions in DC. (Jul 1999)

Ereshkigal wrote:

Voted YES on banning gay adoptions in DC. (Jul 1999)

I'm pretty sure any real libertarian would vote NO on that. But hell, I'd definitely choose him over Clinton any day.

micfranklin wrote:

Ereshkigal wrote:

Voted YES on banning gay adoptions in DC. (Jul 1999)

I'm pretty sure any real libertarian would vote NO on that. But hell, I'd definitely choose him over Clinton any day.

Don't get me wrong, i see a lot about him i do like, but his anti-abortion and anti-gay stance is no good.

If i could vote only for clinton, or ron paul, i would vote for neither.

Ereshkigal wrote:

micfranklin wrote:

Ereshkigal wrote:

Voted YES on banning gay adoptions in DC. (Jul 1999)

I'm pretty sure any real libertarian would vote NO on that. But hell, I'd definitely choose him over Clinton any day.

Don't get me wrong, i see a lot about him i do like, but his anti-abortion and anti-gay stance is no good.

If i could vote only for clinton, or ron paul, i would vote for neither.

Well given the current people running for 2008, Paul seems like the best choice but that's just opinion.

Hopefully Obama

Sazari wrote:

Hopefully Obama

Better him than Clinton, I would say

no ones gonna win. their all fuckin shit heads!

yoboy220 wrote:

no ones gonna win. their all fuckin shit heads!

Except this Ron Paul guy I keep reading about...

Nader/Paul '08!

ANYONE but Hilary............

Out of the democrats, I only see Kucinich as a good candidate.

rohrya wrote:

Out of the democrats, I only see Kucinich as a good candidate.

Him, Obama, and Gravel are the only three good Dems for me.

micfranklin wrote:

rohrya wrote:

Out of the democrats, I only see Kucinich as a good candidate.

Him, Obama, and Gravel are the only three good Dems for me.

Why Obama? He doesn't look that confident in what he says or how he says it.

rohrya wrote:

micfranklin wrote:

rohrya wrote:

Out of the democrats, I only see Kucinich as a good candidate.

Him, Obama, and Gravel are the only three good Dems for me.

Why Obama? He doesn't look that confident in what he says or how he says it.

Is looking confident a requirement to be president?

It'll probably end up being between Clinton or Giuliani in the end. I'm hoping for Mitt Romney to get a slot though.